The Suez Canal took 10 years to build and cost thousands of workers their lives. When planners suggested three years for a second one, Egypt’s president balked.
“Not three years, just one,” he ordered.
Twelve months later, Abdel-Fattah El-Sisi hosted a party to celebrate the biggest expansion of the canal since it first opened in 1869. For the former army chief seeking to bolster his rule, the symbolism was impossible to miss.
Less clear are the economic benefits of what billboards in Cairo and New York’s Times Square dubbed “Egypt’s gift to the world,” which will raise capacity and shorten the time it takes to sail the 193-kilometer (120-mile) link between the Red Sea and the Mediterranean.
The lavish August 6 opening ceremony of the expanded canal, attended by dignitaries including French President Francois Hollande and North Korea’s deputy leader Kim Yong Nam, was held amid sluggish global trade growth to which the canal’s fortunes are linked.
From a shipping industry point of view, the initiative to expand the Suez canal was a bit of a surprise to many because there was no pressing need for it. Plus it did not, and still does not, make business sense.
Suez has yet to fully recover since the global financial crisis caused shipping to plummet in 2009. Though total tonnage has increased, the number of vessels using the canal remains 20 percent below its 2008 level and just two percent higher than a decade ago.
Rather than a bottleneck, analysts say those statistics reflect slower global trade growth, which the International Monetary Fund (IMF) expects to average 3.4 percent in the period 2007-2016, compared to seven percent over the previous decade.
The Baltic Dry Index, which measures rates for shipping iron ore, coal and grain and is viewed as a bellwether for the global economy, slumped to a record low 509 points in February. It remains about 90 percent below its all-time high of 11,793 reached in 2008.
“At the moment, speed is not a key factor for container shipping, the shipping sector which most utilizes the canal,” according to Michelle Berman, the head of operational risk at BMI Research, a unit of Fitch Group.
A bigger issue is a “surplus of ships” relative to demand, with ever-larger vessels built for the Asia-Europe route compounding the problem.
The government hasn’t made public viability studies to show how it will gain a return on its 64 billion Egyptian pound ($8.2 billion) investment.
The expansion will meet future demand, with traffic expected to double to 97 vessels a day by 2023, said Mohab Mameesh, head of the Suez Canal Authority.
“By creating a second lane of the canal we are able to reduce waiting times, which reduces fuel expenditures and costs, with no increase in our toll fees,” he said.
Global trade volume would need to rise by around nine percent a year for Suez to reach its traffic goal. And this is quite unlikely. But this didn’t stop El-Sisi and his government from talking up the new canal amid political challenges to its rule.
Hundreds of Egyptians, most of them supporters of the deposed Muslim Brotherhood, have been killed and thousands imprisoned since El-Sisi, as army chief, pushed his Islamist predecessor from office in 2013 after mass protests. El-Sisi was elected president last year.
The political turmoil has polarized Egyptians. El-Sisi supporters say it saved the country from the deadly strife affecting much of the Middle East, while opponents criticize the government’s human rights record and what they regard as brutality used to restore stability.
The August 6 canal commissioning party, with an estimated price tag of $30 million, was a chance for the government to send a more positive message by harking back to the events marking the canal’s 1869 completion.
The canal has since transformed global trade with about eight percent of the world’s cargo now passing through it, according to the Suez Canal Authority. Traveling from Singapore to New York through Suez reduces the distance by 19 percent compared to the route via the Pacific and the Panama Canal. From the Persian Gulf to Rotterdam, Suez saves 42 percent by removing the detour around the Cape of Good Hope.
“Even without any improvements, the canal would always be attractive,” said Neil Atkinson, head of analysis at Lloyd’s List Intelligence.
The second canal — actually a new 35-kilometer channel and 37 kilometers of widening and deepening of the original — allows two-way traffic and reduces transit time to 11 hours from 18, according to the canal operator. The expansion won’t allow larger vessels to use the route.
New ports and logistical services are expected to follow, and the project includes six tunnels under the canal. The authority expects revenue to grow to more than $13 billion by 2023, up from $5.5 billion in 2014.
“‘Build it and they will come’ is not enough,” said Simon Kitchen, a strategist with Cairo-Based investment bank EFG- Hermes, adding that companies will require incentives to build factories and other facilities. “The government needs to give ships a reason to sail through the canal,” he said.
Others are more positive. Egypt’s economy grew at over four percent in the nine months to March for the first time since 2010, mainly due to infrastructure spending related to the canal upgrade, according to investment bank Pharos Holding for Financial Investments.
A shorter transit may save up to four percent of journey costs depending on the length.
The project “was a necessity to maintain the attractiveness of the Suez Canal,” said Michael Storgaard, a spokesman for Maersk Line, the world’s biggest container shipping company. Even so, it is too early to say whether Maersk will route more vessels through Suez, he said.
Still, any future economic payoff is trumped by the political implications for the government from building confidence in El-Sisi’s leadership.
Obviously, El-Sisi is trying to gain legitimacy through his government’s achievements. His thinking is that Suez “shows the government can deliver, it can commit to something and get it done”.
Perhaps this “wasteful expenditure” has some silver lining which other African leaders can borrow a leaf from?