Customs brokers, forwarders to Customs: ACE not ready for February rollout

U.S. customs brokers and forwarders are asking Customs and Border Protection to halt all software changes tied to a system aimed at streamlining the filing of import and export documentation just weeks before it is set to take effect, saying the Automated Commercial Environment (ACE), or single window, is not ready.

The warning from the National Customs Brokers and Forwarders Association of America (NCBFAA) is the latest sign that the rollout of ACE might not be smooth. The program with already more than $1 billion over budget and three years overdue was initially supposed to come online in November, but Customs pushed back the timeline.

“We have said that live testing of software by importers and exporters, by brokers and forwarders, by software providers, and by CBP jointly, without any further changes whatsoever, demand a minimum of 60 days. Customs now says that its work is complete; the facts, however, suggest otherwise,” the National Customs Brokers and Forwarders Association of America said in letter dated January, 8 and sent to the agency.

The NCBFAA is concerned that because the single window is being constantly updated, with some changes slated to be introduced on the transition date of Feb 28, shipper software will not be able to handle some changes, which could result in bugs and other technical problems that may delay shipments and create costs.

Should there be problems with the single window; shippers will be left without recourse to file Customs paperwork because the old system for filing this necessary documentation is set to be shut down on the same day the single window takes effect.

“We have reached a critical juncture in the life cycle of this project. In order to avoid unprecedented delays and unnecessary out-of-pocket expenses, developmental work to include meaningful testing and process development by the private sector must be completed before use of the new system is mandated and the existing system is terminated.

“What was supposed to be a change welcomed by shippers because of simplicity and $3 billion in savings has become a source of unease because new features are being added to the system without proper testing. Computer coding can sometimes result in a game of whack-a-mole, where new features and fixes break the code elsewhere, creating unforeseen consequences,” the NCBFAA said.

While warning against rushing ahead with the single window, the NCBFAA also said it still supports the program but wants to avoid what happened to Australia in 2005 when it implemented a single window before the system was finalized and tested.

Copyright Ships & Ports Ltd. Permission to use quotations from this article is granted subject to appropriate credit given to as the source.