Maersk Line: Asia-Europe trade set to rebound in 2016

There is growing evidence that recent declines on the Asia-Europe trade are set to be reversed, Maersk Line’s Asia Chief Executive Robert van Trooijen said while speaking on Wednesday at the TOC Asia Container Supply Chain conference in Singapore.

Last year container volumes from Asia to Europe declined by 4%, while the first quarter of this year has seen them decline further by 6% year-on-year, one of the worst starts to a year in terms of both volumes and freight rates since the financial crisis.

Maersk believes that one of the reasons why container volumes on the trade have been so weak over the last 15 months was due to European retailers’ strategy to run down stocks.

The company expects this trend to reverse as the year progresses, however.

“The retail industry in Europe spent much of last year destocking, but our economists expect that there will be some restocking later this year and we think that the trade may well rebound further than we have seen this year so far.

“We do see some positive trends in 2016 and we think it may surprise us in terms of volumes over the remainder of the year,” he said.

He predicted that this would likely lead to an increase in current freight rate levels, which he described as “unsustainable”, meaning carriers were unable to protect the supply chain’s integrity, in the second and third quarters of the year.

As a result Maersk announced on Tuesday a USD 550 per TEU general rate increase to take effect on 1 May.

Jim Lim, senior manager of transport excellence, procurement and global logistics at Applied Materials, agreed: “The heyday of lower rates for customers is over – those rock bottom rates will be a thing of the past.

“As Europe gradually exits recession I think that the worst is probably over for carriers.”

Van Trooijen admitted that part of reason why rates had fallen to such desperate levels was due to the vicious circle that had been created by lines ordering such large quantities of ultra-large container vessels (ULCVs) and the sustained increases in shipping capacity.

“Excess deployed capacity levels have led to lower utilisation such that a vessel which is 95% full is unable to make money, and in some cases vessels which are 99% full are losing money.

“In addition there is a 20% downfall – bookings which are made where the container does not show for the sailing – which means that carriers effectively have to overbook a vessel by 20%; and if a ship isn’t full then the sailing has to be blanked.

“And that is very different to a couple of years ago,” Van Trooijen added.

Lim also added that structural changes in global supply chains could offer new opportunities for carriers seeking cargo and possibly more balanced trades.

“There are a lot of opportunities to take advantage of nearshoring, where a lot of manufacturing is mobbing to East Europe, places such as Poland and Hungary, and I think shipping lines should be looking to capture more eastbound cargo – carriers have invested so much in the westbound route and there are growing opportunities for them to develop their eastbound services,” he said.


Copyright Ships & Ports Ltd. Permission to use quotations from this article is granted subject to appropriate credit given to as the source.